Dialysis world news


Functional Adaptive Hyperfiltration May Affect Renal Function after Radical ... - Cancer Therapy Advisor

New data are suggesting functional adaptive hyperfiltration may be more important than structural adaptive hypertrophy for the recovery of renal function following radical nephrectomy (RN).

Researchers at the Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine in Korea have found that patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have lower preoperative GFR had less of a reduction in postoperative renal function than patients with higher preoperative GFR due to greater degrees of functional hyperfiltration.1

Choi and colleagues investigated structural hypertrophy and functional hyperfiltration as compensatory adaptations following RN in 543 patients with RCC.

All the patients were retrospectively identified and underwent RN between 1997 and 2012. Patients were classified according to preoperative GFR and CKD stage. The researchers assessed functional renal volume (FRV) through CT images taken within 2 months prior to surgery and 12 months after surgery.

The mean age of the patients was 56.0 years and the mean preoperative GFR was 83.2 mL/min/1.73m2. The mean preoperative FRV was 340.6 cm3 and the mean preoperative GFR/FRV was 0.25 ml/min/1.73m2/cm3.

The researchers found the reduction in GFR was statistically significant according to CKD stage (no CKD -31.2% compared to CKD stage 2 -26.5%). The reduction in GFR for CKD stage 3 was -12.8%.

RELATED: AUA 2015: New Studies May Enhance Ability to Predict Renal Cell Carcinoma Outcomes

While the degree of hypertrophic FRV in the remnant kidney was not statistically significant, the change in GFR/FRV was statistically significant (no CKD was 18.5% compared to 20.1% for CKD stage 2).

The change in GFR/FRV was 45.9% in the CKD stage 3. The researchers write that factors that increased GFR/FRV above the mean value were body mass index, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and CKD stage.

...

 
Weekend Hospitalizations Worsen Outcomes for Metastatic PCa Patients - Renal and Urology News
June 25, 2015 Weekend Hospitalizations Worsen Outcomes for Metastatic PCa Patients - Renal and Urology News
They are more likely to die and suffer complications compared with those admitted on weekdays.

Patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) are more likely to die in the hospital if they are admitted on a weekend instead of a weekday, according to a new study.

Researchers led by Marianne Schmid, MD, of Harvard Medical School in Boston, used the National Inpatient Sample to identify 534,011 hospitalized patients with metastatic PCa. Of these, 81.7% were admitted on a weekday and 18.3% on a weekend. The in-hospital mortality rate was 8.6% for patients admitted on a weekend and 10.9% for those admitted on a weekend. In multivariate analysis, a weekend admission was associated with a significant 20% increased odds of death and 15% increased odds of complications compared with a weekday admission, Dr. Schmid's team reported online ahead of print in BJU International.

Patients admitted over the weekend were significantly more likely than those admitted on weekdays to be treated at rural hospitals (17.8% vs. 15.7%), non-teaching hospitals (57.6% vs. 53.7%), and low-volume hospitals (53.4% vs. 49.4%). Weekend patients also were significantly less likely than weekday patients to undergo interventional procedures (10.6% vs. 11.4%), including cystoscopy with clot evacuation (4.0% vs. 34.4%) and ureteral stent/percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement (3.7% vs. 4.2%). They also were significantly less likely to undergo diagnostic imaging (5.7% vs. 6.5%).

The investigators discussed some hypotheses proposed to explain the cause of the “weekend effect.” Prior studies have suggested that decreased staffing on weekends may decrease the intensity of medical care provided in that setting. “This was congruent with data from our study which suggest that patients admitted over the weekend were less likely to undergo diagnostic imaging and procedures such as cystocopy with clot evacuation and ureteral stent/percutaneous nephrostomy tube.” Other studies suggest that physicians covering weekends often provide coverage for more patients and may be less familiar with them, they noted. “Taken together, patients presenting over the weekend may be subjected to delayed or inappropriate diagnosis and therapy,” the authors wrote.

...

 
Most Dialysis Patients Aren't Receiving The Best Treatment - 88.9 KETR

For the past 20 years, doctors have recommended that dialysis patients have a simple operation to make it safer and easier to connect to a machine that cleans their blood.

Yet only 20 percent of new dialysis patients are receiving the lifelines known as arteriovenous fistulas, a study published Wednesday in JAMA Surgery finds. With about 100,000 people starting dialysis each year, that means 80,000 patients aren't receiving the preferred standard of care, putting them at a higher risk of infection, blood clots and even death.

"Doctors are usually really good about following standards of care and recommendations, but in this area, we are failing miserably," said Dr. Mahmoud Malas, a surgeon at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine who led the study. "We have had recommendations for [the best possible care for] 20 years now, but after all this time, only about 20 percent of those starting dialysis are getting it done right."

Kidneys play a vital role in our daily lives. They constantly clean our blood, removing harmful toxins that are eventually disposed through our urine. When someone's kidneys fail, the organs can no longer perform this essential function and weekly dialysis treatment is used in their stead.

Connections called arteriovenous fistulas are the preferred method for patients to connect to hemodialysis machines. Surgeons stitch together an artery and vein, usually in the arm, to create a sturdier vein with greater blood flow. The fistula reduces dialysis treatment time, while increasing the effectiveness of the blood cleaning.

Fistulas are also safer. "Chances of you dying are 30 to 40 percent less if you use a fistula," Malas says.

Despite these clear benefits, only about 1 in 5 new dialysis patients receive fistulas, according to national data analyzed by Malas and his team.

The researchers collected data from the U.S. Renal Data System, which tracks all patients with end-stage renal disease. They looked at 464,547 individuals who began dialysis between January 2006 and December 2010.

Texas, Florida and South Carolina had the lowest number of ESRD patients obtaining fistulas, with only about 1 in 9 patients receiving fistulas. But instead of pointing the finger at the puny performance of those three states, Malas says it's more important to see the bigger problem.

"Even if you look at the region that had the highest incidence of fistulas, which was New England, they only had a 22.2 percent usage," he says. "That's still pathetic."

"This is an opportunity for improvement in general," says nephrologist Joe Vassalotti, who works at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. "It's a call to action for the whole country. Everyone would agree that more than 20 percent of patients should be starting with fistulas. Everyone would agree we can do better."

So what's stopping new dialysis patients from getting fistulas?

Malas' research documents the heavy dependence on catheters for dialysis. These are small plastic tubes, usually placed in a vein along the neck, chest, leg or groin, that are open to infection. However, the tubes mean patients don't have to be stuck with needles during dialysis.

"Some patients don't want to be poked," Malas says. "They don't want a needle going into their arm three times a week like fistulas require."

But more importantly, he says, primary care doctors may not be vigilant enough for kidney disease in the first place.

"I don't think doctors are failing," he says. "I think they are overwhelmed by seeing so many patients every day, and it's very hard to recognize when kidneys start deteriorating. Kidney failure can be symptomless and silent for a long time. It's easily missed."

And if it's missed, patients can suddenly "crash into dialysis," requiring emergency hospitalization and dialysis. Catheters are the quickest ways to treat emergency kidney failures because they can be used immediately after insertion. Fistulas, on the other hand, cannot be used for six to 12 weeks after the operation.

To avoid dialysis crashes and emergency use of catheters, Malas recommends doctors pay special attention to patients who have a family history of kidney disease, hypertension and diabetes, which are risk factors for kidney failure.

Once kidney failure is recognized, it helps to get a nephrologist — or kidney specialist — involved quickly. Patients assigned to nephrologists are 11 times more likely to receive fistulas than those without one, according to the study.

"I think what's really important about this research is that it emphasizes seeing nephrologists," says Mount Sinai's Vassalotti, who is also the lead clinical consultant for Fistula First Catheter Last, a national initiative to increase the use of fistulas. "People living with kidney disease should prepare in advance and have fistula surgery before they crash and before it's too late."

Receiving a fistula operation takes months of preparation, but nephrologists can get the process going early on, he says.

Malas says that he hopes his study will make patients and doctors more aware of kidney disease and the benefits of dialysis via fistulas.

"Fifteen thousand deaths occur each year because the wrong method of dialysis is being used," he says. "This country could save thousands of lives if we start doing the right thing."

Copyright 2015 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.image

...

 
Most Dialysis Patients Aren't Receiving The Best Treatment - KOSU

For the past 20 years, doctors have recommended that dialysis patients have a simple operation to make it safer and easier to connect to a machine that cleans their blood.

Yet only 20 percent of new dialysis patients are receiving the lifelines known as arteriovenous fistulas, a study published Wednesday in JAMA Surgery finds. With about 100,000 people starting dialysis each year, that means 80,000 patients aren't receiving the preferred standard of care, putting them at a higher risk of infection, blood clots and even death.

"Doctors are usually really good about following standards of care and recommendations, but in this area, we are failing miserably," said Dr. Mahmoud Malas, a surgeon at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine who led the study. "We have had recommendations for [the best possible care for] 20 years now, but after all this time, only about 20 percent of those starting dialysis are getting it done right."

Kidneys play a vital role in our daily lives. They constantly clean our blood, removing harmful toxins that are eventually disposed through our urine. When someone's kidneys fail, the organs can no longer perform this essential function and weekly dialysis treatment is used in their stead.

Connections called arteriovenous fistulas are the preferred method for patients to connect to hemodialysis machines. Surgeons stitch together an artery and vein, usually in the arm, to create a sturdier vein with greater blood flow. The fistula reduces dialysis treatment time, while increasing the effectiveness of the blood cleaning.

Fistulas are also safer. "Chances of you dying are 30 to 40 percent less if you use a fistula," Malas says.

Despite these clear benefits, only about 1 in 5 new dialysis patients receive fistulas, according to national data analyzed by Malas and his team.

The researchers collected data from the U.S. Renal Data System, which tracks all patients with end-stage renal disease. They looked at 464,547 individuals who began dialysis between January 2006 and December 2010.

Texas, Florida and South Carolina had the lowest number of ESRD patients obtaining fistulas, with only about 1 in 9 patients receiving fistulas. But instead of pointing the finger at the puny performance of those three states, Malas says it's more important to see the bigger problem.

"Even if you look at the region that had the highest incidence of fistulas, which was New England, they only had a 22.2 percent usage," he says. "That's still pathetic."

"This is an opportunity for improvement in general," says nephrologist Joe Vassalotti, who works at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. "It's a call to action for the whole country. Everyone would agree that more than 20 percent of patients should be starting with fistulas. Everyone would agree we can do better."

So what's stopping new dialysis patients from getting fistulas?

Malas' research documents the heavy dependence on catheters for dialysis. These are small plastic tubes, usually placed in a vein along the neck, chest, leg or groin, that are open to infection. However, the tubes mean patients don't have to be stuck with needles during dialysis.

"Some patients don't want to be poked," Malas says. "They don't want a needle going into their arm three times a week like fistulas require."

But more importantly, he says, primary care doctors may not be vigilant enough for kidney disease in the first place.

"I don't think doctors are failing," he says. "I think they are overwhelmed by seeing so many patients every day, and it's very hard to recognize when kidneys start deteriorating. Kidney failure can be symptomless and silent for a long time. It's easily missed."

And if it's missed, patients can suddenly "crash into dialysis," requiring emergency hospitalization and dialysis. Catheters are the quickest ways to treat emergency kidney failures because they can be used immediately after insertion. Fistulas, on the other hand, cannot be used for six to 12 weeks after the operation.

To avoid dialysis crashes and emergency use of catheters, Malas recommends doctors pay special attention to patients who have a family history of kidney disease, hypertension and diabetes, which are risk factors for kidney failure.

Once kidney failure is recognized, it helps to get a nephrologist — or kidney specialist — involved quickly. Patients assigned to nephrologists are 11 times more likely to receive fistulas than those without one, according to the study.

"I think what's really important about this research is that it emphasizes seeing nephrologists," says Mount Sinai's Vassalotti, who is also the lead clinical consultant for Fistula First Catheter Last, a national initiative to increase the use of fistulas. "People living with kidney disease should prepare in advance and have fistula surgery before they crash and before it's too late."

Receiving a fistula operation takes months of preparation, but nephrologists can get the process going early on, he says.

Malas says that he hopes his study will make patients and doctors more aware of kidney disease and the benefits of dialysis via fistulas.

"Fifteen thousand deaths occur each year because the wrong method of dialysis is being used," he says. "This country could save thousands of lives if we start doing the right thing."

Copyright 2015 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.image

...

 
High-Risk Patients Screened for Bladder Cancer Rarely Die from It - Renal and Urology News
June 25, 2015 High-Risk Patients Screened for Bladder Cancer Rarely Die from It - Renal and Urology News
During a median of 6.5 years of follow-up, none of the 9 cases of bladder cancer diagnosed among 925 patients was muscle invasive.

Patients screened for bladder cancer because they are at high risk for the malignancy rarely develop muscle-invasive disease and are more likely to die from other causes, according to a new study.

A team at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas led by Yair Lotan, MD, analyzed a cohort of 925 patients considered at high risk of bladder cancer because of smoking, potential chemical carcinogen exposure, or both. The group included 886 smokers (95.8%) and 613 (66.3%) who had hazardous occupational exposure. At an initial screening, 57 patients had a positive nuclear matrix protein 22 test and 2 had bladder cancer.

During a median follow-up of 78.4 months, another 9 patients (1%) were diagnosed with bladder cancer; all cases were non-invasive, with 7 low-grade and 4 high-grade cancers, Dr. Lotan's group reported online ahead of print in BJU International. “The low prevalence of invasive disease in this cohort may be attributable to previous or more frequent post-screening urine analysis-based screening,” the authors wrote.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was diagnosed in 10 patients (1.1%) and lung cancer was diagnosed in 18 (1.9%). Of the 925 patients, 134 died, including 3 from RCC and 12 from lung cancer. No patient died from bladder cancer.

“Competing risks of mortality are therefore an important consideration for future bladder cancer screening trials,” the authors concluded.

On multivariable analysis, lung cancer, hematuria, and more than 60 pack-years of smoking independently predicted mortality.

...

 
<< Start < Prev 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 Next > End >>

Page 77 of 2630
Share |
Copyright © 2024 Global Dialysis. All Rights Reserved.